Passive voice, first person pronouns and mental process verbs in the biological sciences research article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21283/2376905X.1.12.2.3160Palabras clave:
biological sciences, first person pronoun, passive voice, process type, research articleResumen
Este artículo tiene por objetivo estudiar el uso de las formas pasivas, los pronombres de primera persona y los tipos de proceso en el artículo de investigación biológica. Estudios recientes realizados sobre una pequeña muestra de artículos en las ciencias físicas sugieren que, en el artículo de investigación de ciencias físicas, existen dos modelos disponibles: uno que utiliza muchas formas pasivas y evita sujetos con pronombres en primera persona; y otro que utiliza pocas pasivas pero emplea con facilidad los sujetos con pronombres en primera persona. El objetivo de este estudio es considerar una muestra similar de las ciencias biológicas y compararla con los artículos de ciencias físicas previamente estudiados. Los seis artículos de investigación biológica analizados muestran un uso moderado de la voz pasiva, y la mayoría utiliza pocos sujetos con pronombres en primera persona. El proceso relacional es el tipo más común, pero el proceso material es el más frecuente en algunos artículos individuales. Dentro de los procesos mentales, el proceso cognitivo es el tipo más común, seguido de los procesos de naturaleza matemática. La mayoría de los sujetos en primera persona aparecen con verbos de proceso mental.
Citas
Arnold, Jennifer E., Kaiser, Elsi, Kahn, Jason M., & Kim, Lucy K. (2013). Information structure: Linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4(3), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1234
Banks, David (1986). The semantics of the so-called "get-passive." Travaux (CIEREC), 47, 67-75.
Banks, David (1994). Writ in water, aspects of the scientific journal article. ERLA, Université de Bretagne Occidentale.
Banks, David (2005a). The case of Perrin and Thomson: An example of the use of a mini-corpus. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.01.001
Banks, David (2005b). Introduction à la linguistique systémique fonctionnelle de l'anglais. L'Harmattan.
Banks, David (2008a). The development of scientific writing. Linguistic features and historical context. Equinox.
Banks, David (2008b). The significance of thematic structure in the scientific journal article, 1700-1980. In N. Nørgard (Ed.), Systemic functional linguistics in use (pp. 1-29). Odense Working Papers in Language and Communications 29.
Banks, David (2016). On the (non)necessity of the hybrid category behavioural process. In Donna Rose Miller, & Paul Bayley (Eds.), Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics. grammar, text and discursive context (pp. 21-40). Equinox.
Banks, David (2017). The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985-2015. Functional Linguistics, 4(12), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0045-5
Banks, David (2019). A systemic functional grammar of English. A simple introduction. Routledge.
Banks, David (2021). Passive voice, first person pronouns and mental process verbs in the physical sciences research article. Revista de Lingüistica y Lenguas Aplicadas, 16(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2021.14434
Barber, Charles L. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In Frank Behre (Ed.), Contributions to English syntax and philology (pp. 21-43). Almqvist & Wiksell.
Bennett, Karen (2009). English academic style manuals: A survey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.12.003
Biber, Douglas, & Gray, Bethany (2013). Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2), 104-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424212472509
Chappell, Hilary (1980). Is the get-passive adversative? Papers in Linguistics, 13(3), 411-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818009370504
Cooke, Ray (1993). Learning to publish in English: How can French researchers bridge the gap? ASp, 1, 463-475. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.4394
Cooray, Mahinda (1967). The English passive voice. English Language Teaching, 21(3), 203-210.
Ding, Daniel D. (2002). The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.2190/EFMR-BJF3-CE41-84KK
Halliday, Michael A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar, (1st edn,). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A.K. (1988). On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy. (Ed.). Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 162-178). Pinter.
Halliday, Michael A.K., & Matthiessen, Christian, M.I.M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, (4th edn.) Routledge.
Hatcher, Anna Granville (1949). To get/be invited. Modern Language Notes, 64(7), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/2910009
Hinkel, Eli (2004): Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic prose, Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/110.1191/1362168804Ir132oa
Huddleston, Rodney D. (1971). The sentence in written English: A syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge University Press.
Hundt, Marianne, Dallas, Bethany, & Nakanish, Shimon (2024). The be- versus get-passive alternative in world Englishes. World Englishes, 43(1), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12633
Hundt, Marianne, Röthlishberger, Melanie, & Seoane, Elena (2018). Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 17(1), 189-222. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0050
Hundt, Marianne, Schneider, Gerold, & Seoane, Elena (2016). The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local versus global usage in an international language. Corpora, 11(1), 29-61. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0084
Hyland, Ken (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, Ken (2002). Options of identity in academic writing? ELT Journal, 56(4), 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351
Hyland, Ken (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003
Hyland, Kenn & Jiang, Feng (Kevin) (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399
Hyland, Ken, & Jiang, Feng (Kevin) (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001
Hyland, Ken, &, Jiang Feng (Kevin) (2018). “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
Lafuente Millán, Enrique (2010). ‛Extending this claim, we propose...’. The writer’s presence in research articles from different disciplines, Ibérica, 20, 35-56.
Leong Ping, Alvin (2014). The passive voice in scientific writing. The current norm in science journals. Journal of Science Communication, 13(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13010203
Martínez, Iliana A. (2005). Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001
Matthiessen, Christian (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo, International Language Sciences.
O’Donnell, Michael, Zappavigna, Michele, & Whitelaw, Casey (2008). A survey of process type classification over difficult cases. In Carys Jones, & Eija Ventola (Eds.). New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning From language to multimodality, (pp. 47-64). Continuum.
Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2014). Fear and loathing of the English passive. Language & Communication, 37, 60-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.08.009
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Lech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Rodman, Lilita (1981). The passive in technical and scientific writing. Journal of Advanced Composition. 2(1-2), 165-172. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20865498
Savory, Theodore H. (1953). The language of science. André Deutsch.
Seoane, Elena (2006). Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt, & Herbt Schendl (Eds.). Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500-200. (pp. 191-209). Peter Lang.
Seoane, Elena (2010). The effect of prominence hierarchies on modern English long passives: Pragmatic vs. syntactic factors. Miscelánia, 41, 93-106. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20109295
Seoane, Elena, & Hundt, Marianne (2018). Voice alternation and authorial presence: Variation across disciplinary areas in academic English. Journal of English Linguistics, 46(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424217740938
Seoane, Elena, & Loureiro-Porto, Lucía (2005). On the colloquialization of scientific British and American English. ESP Across Cultures, 2(1), 106-116.
Seoane, Elena, & Williams, Christopher (2006). Changing the rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse. In Marina Dossena, & Irma Taavitsainen (Eds.). Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English. (pp. 255-276). Peter Lang.
Thompson, Geoff (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd edn.). Arnold.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 David Banks
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
